« Now this is juicy | Main | Rocky Raccoon checked into his room »
June 22, 2007
Priorities
Everybody knows the cameras they install at intersections to catch people running red lights serve two important but distinctive purposes: to keep people from running lights, and to get some cash. Of course, now that some company had created a device that will tip off drivers about the location of these cameras, forward-thinking Alderman Ed Burke wants to ban 'em:
High-tech devices that alert motorists to red-light cameras -- before they get nailed with a $90 ticket -- should be banned in Chicago to preserve a "big revenue source" that has generated $35.1 million since November 2003, a powerful alderman said Thursday.
After getting wind that a Chicago company known for its radar detectors and GPS navigation systems was about to hit the market with a $449.95 red-light and speed camera detector, Finance Committee Chairman Edward M. Burke (14th) vowed to remain one step ahead of the technology game.
He's drafting an ordinance for introduction at the July 19 City Council meeting that would ban camera detectors.
Ever since Chicago entered the Brave New World of traffic enforcement, City Hall has insisted that red-light cameras were about safety -- not money. That's even though red-light cameras now positioned at 39 accident-prone intersections generated 304,011 tickets and $17.9 million in 2006 alone. Thirty-one more cameras are expected to be installed by Dec. 31 for a total of 70 cameras.
I don't know about this one. I don't think they should be banned. Red light cameras are supposed to promote safety, and if somebody knows about the location of one of these cameras, it's safer. They won't run red lights, and if it costs a few bucks to save a life, I'm all for it. So pooh on you, Ed Burke!
entry no. 890
Posted at June 22, 2007 10:22 PM